“His response was to fight it with the only weapons at hand—passive resistance and open displays of contempt.” ― Kurt Vonnegut, The Sirens of Titan
Babysitter Who Had Sex With 11-Year-Old Boy Avoids Jail | Newser Mobile http://m.newser.com/story/213989/babysitter-who-had-sex-with-11-year-old-boy-avoids-jail.html
“This is a very disturbing case involving attempts to find mitigating circumstances,” said the CEO of the charity Kidscape. “However physically mature he might appear, [he] is a child in every sense. He cannot be expected to have the emotional maturity to engage in a sexual relationship.”
Every time a woman sexually abuses a young boy or child, we blame the boy. We attribute to the boy “prurient interest.”
This standard allows female pedophiles to rape boys ( as was the case here), to sexualize and fetishize and otherwise harm boys with impunity.
Womens sexual abuse takes different forms than male abusers, but male abusers are what societies demonize- because it is presumed that women lack the power, or the personal agency- even that women lack sexual desire-to rape.
The case cited is a case where traditional genital to genital, female on male rape occurs, but women’s lack of a penis precipitates more inventive and less documented methods than simply genital to genital rape.
Like they always tell us- womens sexuality is “more complex,” and “mysterious” than male sexuality. So, too, are womens methods if rape.
While women as a monolithic mass benefit from advancements of womens right’s and rightly so, boys are abused in ever increasing numbers in myriad ways- and, blamed for the abuse- because western societies do not value boys, nor acknowledge the emotional garm that comes to them from sexual abuse by women.
This is not what rights are intended for- this is orivilege; and the failure by state agencies to document, investigate, or alter the narrative of the sexual abuse and rapes of boys by women is what privilege looks like in action, because these agencies are funded by federal ” domestic violence” dollars.
These agencies are staffed by women, and influenced by womens organizations- and thede women think raping boys is o.k.
Another attempt to say it plain, which is, even then not simple.
FURTHER READING: Perhaps the double standard is changing a wee tiny bit- woman jailed for “contempt”
QUESTION: is the double standard doubly applied- do frmale pedophiles get off because most often, they act as procurers and panderers to people in power? That female pedophiles are also often pimps as well- who bring revenue to the state and its agents?
Why does America harbor, protect, minimize and obfuscate the abuse children by women?
Whereas the woman above refused to compy with the “domestic violence agenda”- was she sanctioned harshly for protecting a man- a man who benefited her child as a potential bread winner? Does the state, generally, seek to put children closer to the notoriously profitable CPS industry- and that, where a child is most likely to be pimped or abused?