“His response was to fight it with the only weapons at hand—passive resistance and open displays of contempt.” ― Kurt Vonnegut, The Sirens of Titan
Progressive media is attempting to legitimize female pedophiles, as feminists minimize the abuse that women perpetrate.
Haveitselfa peek at the beautiful mother of nine children, below, who is screwing her oldest son:
Here is a better shot of this mother who is fucking her son- her mugshot. Tell me that joke again, the one about cultural relativism and gender bias? Hahahaha:
A mother and son whose forbidden love affair could land them each a lengthy jail sentence have declared they are ‘madly in love’ and nothing will tear them apart.
Monica Mares, 36, and her son Caleb Peterson, 19, face up to 18 months in prison if found guilty of incest at a trial later this year in New Mexico.
But the mother and son couple have vowed to fight for their right to have a sexual relationship and are appealing to the public to donate to their legal fund.
In an exclusive individual interviews with Daily Mail Online, they told how they are willing to risk everything to be together – and have decided to go public with their affair in a bid to raise awareness of Genetic Sexual Attraction (GSA) relationships.
Hey, easy on the tongue, moms! Here, the mother in a deepthroat kiss with her 19 year old son:
I make note of the fact that the woman is not spoken of as a pedophile in the article, nor is there evidence that she had sex with her son before he was of age, and to y knowlege she is not, nor has she ever been implicated as a pedophile.
But motherhood is itself literally defined by the word “grooming” of children, and children are more likely to be physically hrmed, abused, neglected or touched sexually by women! accordingbto mot reputable sources. Mothers, daycare workers and babysitters top the lit of the most common violaters of children, according to the NIST and the FBI.
However, in these cases- and especially in the cases where we see a woman, unmarried, and having more kids than makes any sense, and having those kids without any form of oversight whatsoever-observation proves that in the very least, these women have ‘unusual’ sexual boundaries, and are nearly unmonitored in their behaviors with children.And dertainly, mental health could be an issue of poor choices! Or perhapsvthe other way around.
“forbidden love affair?”
On what planet-in what universe-would anyone but a deviant imagine to call this a love affair? But it is by progressive design, and I suggest, an indicator of a possible child abuser and pedophile. And, it’s happening anywhere you find a single mother, in numbers of victims that have never been protected, or spoken for, nor the mothers scrutinized. The single mother home is a virtual zone of impunity, never criricized in the press, or examined from any perspective other than ‘men should keep it in their pants.’
This is a holdover from the 1960’s counter culture where feminists imagined themselves as goddeses, and witches, who had ‘magical’ powers, and could do no wrong. That thinking affected every level of academia, law, and the associated non-sciences of pychology, sociology, nd epecilly ‘culture studies,’ those vaguely defined Marxist courses in colleges across the west. Nancy Chodorow and others like her erased “patriarchy” by raising children outside the vision of men, and society at large-each child an asset to be used, bartered, leveraged or corrupted as they saw fit to do.
Watch the media- they are currently trying to normalize sex between your 13year old sons and their teachers. The normalizing factorvis that, when these cases appear in the news, the media makes certain that the picture of the young, attractive teaher goes viral-cauing some to remark “I wish my teacher did that to me.”
Which might be true for some, if in fact you want that to be your sons lessons in school. But that thinking is also why engineering and science jobs are going to non-Americans, via the outsourcing of intelligence. And, in this case, the lack of horror in the tone of the article indicates that the author, and the newspaper, are trying to lessen the revulsion to such ideas as your son being deep throat kissed by someone who should be providing opportunity and education.
Further Reading: Men who are creeps, pedophiles and perverts exist, and certinly can harm or ruin kids lives. However, one must ask why cases such as the story above are framed the way they are in media. The short answer to that is “funding sources,” and the profitability of the stranger danger narrative.
But who profits? Beyond police and others who gatekeep the sacred narratives of domestic violence, it is primarily social workers, foster parents, and others central in the lives of children that derive direct compensation for famiy disruptions based on the bogeyman.
After over thirty years of feminists, women, and the allied domestic violence narrators waging that violence on the narrative itself, we find that these same are now willingbto admit wht Martin Feibert told us in the 1980’s: women commit more than 50% of domestic violence, and 54% of child abuse.
So, again -who has profitted off of the pain of children?