“His response was to fight it with the only weapons at hand—passive resistance and open displays of contempt.” ― Kurt Vonnegut, The Sirens of Titan
Meet Jane Agni, who claims to have interviewed a “gang stalker” in an absurd four part series that floats around the web like Baby RUTH.
But if you read it as humor, despite the exploitation of actual victims of gang stalking, sure, it’s funny. Funny in that ‘disinformation/exploitation’ way.
Did I mention that some victims of organized stalking commit suicide after being targeted by organized stalking?
Sure, Hahahahaha. But Jane Agni is a total fraud, likely with ‘mysterious 13 billion dollar ‘investment.
I won’t link to the post because it is a fairly toxic false narrative that has no doubt caused people like Myron May, or Gavin Long, or any number of other mass shooters and others real harm. Her piece is one of those that makes absurd claims, and seeks no real awareness, nor questions her sources credibility in a substantive manner, or even provide any academic objectivity.
In short, Jane Agni is a fraud. Another apparently paid psyop, if even Snopes.com, and a host of independent debunkers have found out.
I am not againt fake news, or clever trolls, but I am dedicated to pointing out a major aspect of my theory: tht organized stalking is real, and that It it is surrounded with false narratives, by multiple groups and individuals, and dysfunctional chatter is often connected to US military, USAFOSI, NSA, FBI, and other groups-for some reason/s as yet to be fully researched.
Many bloggers, writers, and others who seek to understand gang stalking, aka organized stalking, cause stalking, etc, stop at that topic without seeking to undert the individual authors wider worldview. In the case of Jane Agni, aka Aora Bull/von Bullstein, we see both racism, and deep sexism at work, coupled with doses of academic fraud pushed through the cyberstream-for some reason..
Any serious academic research on gang talking, however, incorportes awareness of the propaganda purpose of these authors, and seeks to decipher the purpose of each author, indiviually to separate genuine victims from poison pen propagandists, dubios organizations ( OSI informers and Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance, aka FFCHS*) and mind control operations.
Here below is a “letter to the editor” type of exchange between someone claiming to be a professional journalist, and a writer who has a question or that journalist, as te ‘letter to the editor’ is a classic political propaganda/satire excercise:
I’ve been in such a state of perpetual turmoil ever since giving birth. My child, pronoun “they”, is now 3-years-old. I have been mired in a heinous state of chronic depression because “they” do not want to play with girl’s toys. It destroys me that “they” might be another white CIS male, and another future agent of the patriarchy. That’s just not the type of lifestyle I can support or agree with.
“Their” father has also been deeply despondent over our child’s reluctance to conform to our stance and ideals on gender. My husband identifies as gender neutral, and whenever “Xe” (my husbands current pronoun) witnesses our child playing with toy trucks and trains, it triggers “Xer” so hard that “Xe” crumbles into a quivering pile of inconsolable PTSD jitters.
My question is, how can I persuade my child to blossom into the fabulous transgender individual that I know in my heart “they” truly are? All I’ve ever wanted was a trans child, and the fact that “they” seem so drawn to boys toys and refuse to don the lovely dresses I so painstakingly choose for “them” just crushes my soul. What can I do to make “them” understand the harm that they inflict on our family through “their” identity as a CIS-gendered white male? Please Jane, help us, it’s tearing our family apart.
Ariana, thank you for your touching letter. Truly the phrase, “a mother knows best”, has never been more appropriate than here. No one wants a white, CIS male child, and the people who pretend they do are merely deluding themselves….read hy followng the link above.
The goal of any academic research is that each and every claim that a reseacher makes can be tested-that it can be verified, falsified, elaborted upon or discarded en toto.
In the case cited above, the “professional journalist,” has written one of the more notorious pieces of pure mis-information that makes itselfmavailable to the online community of targeted individuals.
Who could have guessed? But then, most victims of organized stalking usually don’t have the time, money, or education with which to call these fruds what they are. And, I ask you, thevresearcher to tet my hypotheses against your own.
*FFCHS has notoriously been called a suicide cult due to Aaron Alexis, Myron May, and most recently Gavin Long aka Cosmo Setepenra’s affiliation and close contact with them just before they went full Manchurian.
The fact that many mass shooters, and others related to their operations have been induced to suicide, incarceration, mental institutions, or other acts and activities itself indicates that they are a propaganda PsyOp, as is Jane Agni.