“His response was to fight it with the only weapons at hand—passive resistance and open displays of contempt.” ― Kurt Vonnegut, The Sirens of Titan
Currently, only two academic studies specifically address “gang stalking”as a phenomenon, and both are, predictably, very flawed in the way most mainstream media and government wish you to see the issue. One is by Dr. Loraine Sheridan and David V. James., and the other is a masters thesis by Elizabeth E. Dietrich, of Smith College, and Berkely.
Here are those studies- and neither of them actually physically spoke to a single victim of gang stalking in person. One must wonder about that, indeed. These ‘researchers’ are little more than Public Relations agents for the suppression of the ample evidence on the issue.
If the current partisan campaign to stifle those who question official narratives is any sign, Elizabeth E. Dietrich is a signatory into that politik. Here Dietrich’s paper:
Elizabeth E. Dietrich is, herself, and interesting study. A Smith College grad, now tied to a Berkely CA, institute, online she has had several personas over the years, and one of them appears to be as an outspoken AIPAC Zionist. It can be argued that these have been implicated in both mind control experiments, and organized stalking itself.
From Dietrich: “concerns about small online social communities that purport to support their members, but which in actuality exacerbate mental health issues. Here, the author focuses on one such community that has gone unstudied: The Gang Stalking community. Here, individuals who seem to suffer from Delusional Disorder come together”
Dietrichs concern, scattered throughout her paper, seems to be that targeted individuals create, maintain, and perpetuate their own misery- and that this leads to delusions and isolation. And not un-noticeably, the very title of her paper indicates that she favors disconnecting some individuals from the internet- that her whole thesis is, in fact, an argument for further isolating and silencing individuals in that community!
Her solution to internet poisoning that has created, in Dietrichs mind ‘ delusional people’ is to enhance their delusions withisolation. How reminiscent of Donald Ewen Cameron indeed.
2. Dr. Lorraine P. Sheridan, and David V. James on gang stalking in the Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology recommend that you don’t dif too deep into what organized gang stalking actually IS.
Volume 26, 2015 – Issue 5 by Lorraine P. Sheridan and David V James
Most notably, Sheridan and James did what others in the APA, et al did when confronted with the cases where the CIA tortured people, and did everything they could to discredit torture victims, Sheridan and James ‘paper’ might as well have come straight from an intelligence agency psychological operations manual:According to her, gang stalking self reported victims scored ” highly on depressive symptoms, post-traumatic symptomatology and adverse impact on social and occupational functioning.”
The study, it might be added, is so loaded with design flaws, bias, and narrative fictions that it is nearly useless as a guide of any kind. And, predictably, she concludes that “Group-stalking appears to be delusional in basis.”
The conclusion that the crazies should all be referred to psychologists and police- the EXACT community that gang stalking victims indicate is perpetrating the harassment- is so absurd as that one would wonder if she would refer a CIA torture victim back to the authorities at Guantanamo, or a black site.
So, for example, in Sheridan and James’ conceptualization of the traumas, harassment, and extra-judicial violence that victims claim we see that her recommendation is to report this individual to the exact people this individual claims has harmed them.
The FBI CVE program ( and its British PsyOps counterparts) uses social workers, psychologists, and others in the community as informants, and replaces traditional case management strategies with FBI oversight. In other words, it replaces trained professional counselors with FBI lawyers and ‘handlers’ that control an individual, and that individuals life experience.
Sheridan and James recommend that the victim of a social worker who is an informant for example-instead of reporting to other sociologists, psychologists, or social workers- we now see case management where the FBI is squeezing a victim in order to create a confidential informant; them when that potential informant refuses ‘treatment’ or otherwise balks at the scheme- turn them over to the police!
How ABSURD is that? It’s beyond Kafka to even know. But in this scheme, the FBI, the psychologists, and the police work together to discredit an individuals narrrative, and render real experiences ‘delusional.’
The Sheridan and James study is largely indefensible military grade disinformation, but at least she noted that “complainants suffer marked psychological and practical sequelae.”
And, the Dietrich paper is a naked attempt to discredit and isolate people with invalidation of their experiences.
I suggest that any other research on organized gang stalking refer to the section in the intelligence agency handbok on “mis-information and discrediting” operations before they weigh in too heavily.
But here below, are links to other research that vindicates the academic fraud above:
Victims of CIA torture sue psychologists who encouraged it:
Racism can Cause PTSD similar to War: http://www.medicaldaily.com/changes-dsm-5-racism-can-cause-ptsd-similar-soldiers-after-war-246177
MLN/NIH notes that exposure to pervasive violence and threat contributes to asthma: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1242087/
The CalGang database is a tracking tool- and the Electronic Frontier Foundation is calling for an overhaul: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/08/demand-california-fix-calgang-its-deeply-flawed-gang-database
The CalGang database follows people wherever they go: https://www.revealnews.org/article/you-may-be-in-californias-gang-database-and-not-even-know-it/
Academic research on gang stalking is, some might argue, conspicuously and perhaps, conveniently missing from both sociological research, and psychology texts, leading some to believe that, like APA psychologists conspiring with government to participate in CIA torture, the narrative and the literature is extremely suppressed.
And today, as we see victims of that torture suing the CIA and the psychologists who condoned it, we are reminded that ignorance is not bliss, but in fact, carries a great social, legal, moral, and ethical penalty for those who fail to uphold their oaths of office, and practices. We know that stalking in general carries emotional and mental costs; and that sociologists and psychologists are aware of this.
And we know that biased practices, targeting individuals and groups carry similar human costs, such as the correlation of PTSD and racism.
But still no gang stalking papers, no organized stalking acknowledgement from government agents and agencies. Why IS that? Of course, we intuitively know the answer, but don’t want to say it out loud- because you don’t want to be tossed into the crazy people barrel of monkeys/ targeted individuals.
Yup- that is how scary it is to even talk about this out loud- because it carries consequences.
Here are the two academic papers that have attempted in their own gatekeeping way to shine a light on the practice of gang stalking:
Yet there is still silence about the issue of gang stalking. While it is convenient for some in the healing professions, and in media to claim that those who are “gang stalked” are a bunch of crazy people, it is within the spectrum of social workers, psychologists, and others in professional fields to raise cause for concern- but again, conspicuously, they don’t.
Is this because they have been enlisted in the “if you see something, say something,” scheme of intelligence and police agencies, like the FBI’s CVE program that askes those charged to care to become de facto informants themselves?
Or is it something more- should those charged with recognizing the signs of mental illness not be held accountable for ‘not knowing’ about this phenomenon?
Some maintain that the government does not want these cases to see the light of a court room, or their fair hearing in the court of public opinion- that some are even killed, jailed, and otherwise harmed for bring it to light.
This blog seeks to change that climate of controlled release of data, and information that continues to conspire to conceal this hidden, but very real practice, that carries actual costs for its concealment.
Many sites exist about gang stalking- but also, many are operatives of the United States government: https://authenticmentoring.wordpress.com/2014/11/24/satanic-gang-stalking-and-electronic-harassment-the-stench-that-ushers-in-a-healthy-5d-earth/