“His response was to fight it with the only weapons at hand—passive resistance and open displays of contempt.” ― Kurt Vonnegut, The Sirens of Titan

The psychology of gang stalking, and the difference between conspiracy theory and delusion | The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories touts the discredited SHERIDAN & JAMES study

THESE ARE COMMENTS LEFT AT THE BLOG ABOVE. SCROLL DOWN PAST THE BREAK FOR COMMENTARY, with Mr. Woods piece spliced between. And, a special note for Mr. Woods: you repeat a stuy, drawn completely from the internet? I might as well interview my refrigerator, with a hasbara troll inside it, wrapped in the U.K. flag for warmth,  calling out answers. “Gefilte or lox?” I say.

 Refrigerator saaaays: “Bacon, today, just because I’m feeling porky, nd there is a feeding trough ahead of me!”

My comments from https://conspiracypsychology.com, an academic attempt by very young academic men, to analyse internet propaganda through the lense of conspiracy:

Pitchess Motion says:

September 23, 2016 at 1:54 am

The Ecuadoran Embassy documented that massive radiation was focused at it, by white vans across the street, as Julian Assange holed up there.
Dr. Bruce Ivins ( the guy who the FBI tried to frame into being the 2001 AMERITHRAX suspect) killed himself as the FBI sat in a house next door to his. He had been under years of duress and constant surveillance.
Years later, an FBI whistleblower confirmed that it was a frameup, and that Dick Cheney and his butt boy Scooter Germ Boy Libby likely was responsible for the hoax/domestic terror event. The FBI knew that at the time as well, but needed a public hanging to continue the hoax, and garner massive hero PR
Jacob Applebaum has been gang stalked, Jean Seberg killed herself because of non-stop COINTELPRO harassment.
You can’t dismiss database abuse, StingRay tracking, and outright malicious prosecution of eternal suspects as a factor in “gang stalking.
It is likely the actual term came into vogue during the 2001-05 era, when few Americans knew that police and LEO’s were massively abusing the privacy of ‘targeted individuals’ aka ‘suspects,’ and the cases where the FBI was putting the squeeze on subjects via “disruption campaigns” as covered by the Intercept.
Here is the CalGang database, which has ruined the lives of many barrio kids utilizing guilt by association.

You may be in California’s gang database and not even know it

As fr the @sshole up there mocking people who use ALL CAPS, it might behoove you to recognize your class bias- many of these targeted persons are low skilled, low status individuals- and mocking their pain is just sadistic. But then again, you knew that- you are what they call a “perp”. Probably a Mormon too. You inbreds make ideal Special Agents.


futuret says:

September 24, 2016 at 2:03 am



Pitchess Motion says:

September 24, 2016 at 10:54 am

To the blog/post author: take minute to note that when one of ‘me’ posts incidents from the real world, about verified gang stalking events, targeting real world whistle blowers, the asshts show up pimping their asshat mysticism, and discrediting narratives “aliens implanted a zapping chip in my genitals!!! New WORLD order!!!”
It would do you well to study the “discrediting narrative”and actual cases like activist John Lang of Fresno California who got excellent footage of gang stalking in action before he died ( and likely the only court worthy footage on the internet of gang stalking, aka ‘investgation’). He climed he was being pedofied becuse he criticized police.
There are so many cases where gang tlking is actually, and clearly invetigation or plain harassment by LEO’s that if you take the time to sort through the morons and pychopathic disinformation nutters from JTRIG, the trail leads-clearly-to gang stalking as cover for the massive illegalty we see today with LEO’s.
And religions, and institutions, corporations, private contractors, etc.
My blog is offering up to a $15,000 reward for the capture, indictment, and successful prosecution of any individual gang stalker that leads to the further prosecutions of organized gang stalkers.
That might supplement two years of college for the right researcher.
Menwhile, oak in this load of mind control B.S. from uturet, bove:
” It is going to take a huge leap for the 10% who get to this level of understanding. But if you study your Bible closely, you will see mention of fallen angels mating with earthly women to give birth to Nephalim (Giants) (Genesis 6:4 and 2 Samuel 21:20, for example). There are many modern-day Biblical scholars who are prepared to say that the minotaurs of old and the UFO and alien sightings of today are evidence of these fallen angels.”


Yup-sayanim aren’t just some kabbalistic crap-they also work at the Mossad, apparently, or MI5…


The psychology of gang stalking, and the difference between conspiracy theory and delusion

Posted on June 11, 2016 by Mike Wood

“If you’ve spent enough time on the Internet (or read the New York Times yesterday), you might have come across the phenomenon of gang stalking – the alleged stalking of particular individuals by organized groups. It might seem like gang stalking is a sort of conspiracy theory, and that we can maybe understand it in the same way that we think about things like the 9/11 Truth Movement and beliefs in UFO coverups. I’m not sure about this. There are some pretty major psychological differences between the two. It’s probably not helpful to conflate run-of-the-mill conspiracy theories, which are not considered to be an indicator of psychopathology, with gang stalking, which is widely considered to be the product of delusional thinking.
In gang stalking, large gangs of perpetrators will (allegedly) use subtle methods of manipulation and harassment – muttering hurtful phrases or insults while passing their target on the street, repeatedly driving past the target’s house, preventing them from sleeping by making loud noises at odd hours, and so on. Many people who claim to be victims of gang stalking (search YouTube for a reasonably representative sample) allege more exotic stalking methods – in particular, “electronic harassment,” the use of advanced technology to torture, annoy, or even control the mind of the target from afar.
If you think this sounds pretty far-fetched, you’re not wrong. Stalking is real, of course – there’s no denying that. And there are situations where multiple people participate in bullying or even stalking – often close friends or family members. But “gang stalking” – the type that involves muttered insults, dozens of strangers working together, electronic harrassment, secret hand signals – is not really an accepted thing. In fact, suspicions of gang stalking are considered to be markers of delusional disorders like paranoid schizophrenia. In a 2015 study, Sheridan and James examined 128 reports of group (gang) stalking in an online questionnaire and found that all of them – every single one – exhibited delusional qualities.

From an examination of free-text responses, all 128 group-stalked cases fell into one or more of three categories:
cases where the resources or elaborate organisation required to carry them out made the alleged activities highly improbable (e.g. hostile operatives being inserted in victim’s workplace and their children’s schools; 24-h electronic surveillance involving teams of men in black vans; surveillance by cameras placed throughout the city; staff of shops and libraries being amongst the group stalkers; everyone in the street being ‘plants’ acting out roles towards the victim; ‘more than a thousand’ people being involved; traffic lights being manipulated always to go red on approach; repeated sexual assault during sleep; horns on the street hooting to bring attention to particular sentences on the radio; collaboration between diverse agencies, such as the Automobile Association, a building society, a website and neighbours),

cases in which the activities described were impossible (e.g. minds of friends and family being externally controlled; use of ‘voice to skull’ messages; witchcraft focussed through gold objects; insertion of alien thoughts; organised electronic mind interference; remote removal of bank notes through electronic attraction; invasion of an individual’s dreams at night), and

cases where the beliefs were not only impossible, but bizarre (e.g. docile family dog replaced by exact double with foul temper; remote enlargement of bodily organs).

Gang stalking victim advocates maintain that any resemblance to psychosis is either coincidental, or the result of the very real harassment itself – that the sophisticated influencing technologies can mimic the symptoms of schizophrenia by inducing hallucinations, paranoid thinking, and so on….”

And so on, indeed. 

Academics, it seems, are incapable of separating wheat from chaff, because diplomas, degrees, official titles and credibility claims-and most importantly-government funding for research get in the way!

I posted comments to this academic blog, and noticed that one of my two comments didn’t get posted (….). Of course, it was the valuable comment-the one where I offer a 15,000 reward for the capture of cowardly gang stalkers. And, when that commentvdidn’t apper, I posted another one day later, reiterating my reward. We’ll see if that one stays.

But these guys at least, seem to be delving a bit deeper than most academics-but largely, just acting as ‘mockingbirds’ for the official narrative: ‘ is the internet excacerbating gang stalking delusions?!’

” Shall we deny, discredit, deceive, or otherwise discount the factual, actual cases where whistle blowers, Guantanamo torture victims, targets of ‘community policing’ and ‘disruption’campaigns thst use illegal data collection methods, and entrapment schemes that leave even Hitler and Goebbels jealous?

And should people from low income, low status social groups use the internet to discuss their agonizing plight of being bullied, and silenced by powerful group, persons, institutions, and intelligence agencies?”

Well-you get the idea. 

And, here above are my comments ( laden with spelling errors because ‘for some unknown reason’  my device falters at certain letters on my keyboard…) and note how quickly some lunatic spouting mysticism and pure disinformation shows up right after I posted! Kids-read books, learn an instrument-twidle your thumbs! But the internet is plainly loaded with perverse agents of the state, and lots of really bad stuff beyond them, and their ‘webterrogtion’ and dis/misinformation techniques


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on September 24, 2016 by in Uncategorized.

We’re all so meta that the NSA targets our intellectual detritus.


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 14 other followers

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 14 other followers


Follow pop~agenda~culture on WordPress.com


Member of The Internet Defense League

%d bloggers like this: